Chelsea FC ? Blues news headlines
Lee Parker brings you the latest news from the training ground.
Video Rating: 5 / 5
Posted: 10? 2nd, 2011 under News Headlines.
Tags: Blues, Chelsea, Headlines, News
Comments
Comment from PiMpStEr360
Time 2011?10?2? at 6:59 PM
@FrankLampardd08 Do you really think we rested any players on Wednesday ? Kalou making one pass that couldve lead to a goal does not redeem his idiot mistake. A win at Valencia wouldve put us in a great position, theres no argument against that. Kalou ruined it. Yes, he may have scored that offside winner against Spurs, yes, he may have scored that equiliser against ManU in 2008, but he still hasnt lived up to the potential he showed at Feyenoord, and it doesnt look like he will.
Comment from FrankLampardd08
Time 2011?10?2? at 7:04 PM
@PiMpStEr360 lol? wtf are u talking about? the quicker we qualify? it doesnt matter, the ucl is always a chance to rest our players. look at our depth theres no chance were gonna have trouble doing that. fucking stupid. Kalou created a golden opportunity for anelka, again what more do u want. he split defenders with his pass, anelka failed to finish.
Comment from PiMpStEr360
Time 2011?10?2? at 7:04 PM
@FrankLampardd08 are you seriously joking ? The quicker we qualify the better. The more we can rest key players for important games on the weekend. If Kalou wanted to redeem himself he should?ve scored. He obviously didnt. We?ve had the guy for about 5 years now, and everyone is trying to be patient, hoping that he will become a good player. The truth is, he?s not 21 anymore, and hes far from 1st team material. He should make way for younger players like Kakuta.
Comment from FrankLampardd08
Time 2011?10?2? at 7:49 PM
@PiMpStEr360 lol are u afraid were not gonna qualify? are u serious? i have no doubt in my mind chelseas gonna win the group leversuken and valencia have a double header they?re def gonna split points there. and every1 seems to be forgetting kalou creating a golden opportunity for anelka, where he failed to finish. kalou redeemed himself. every1 just wants to place the blame on one person hes a great player and has scored tons of important goals for us.
Comment from PiMpStEr360
Time 2011?10?2? at 8:23 PM
@FrankLampardd08 LOL. Really ? How dumb do u have to be to stick your hand out at a corner on the 86th minute when your team is wining 1-0. Who should i blame ? Cech for not saving the Penalty ? Obviously we had more chances to score, but thats just another element of the game. Lets call a spade a spade, if Kalou hadn?t been such an idiot we?d have 6 points now, and would have practically qualified/
Comment from FrankLampardd08
Time 2011?10?2? at 9:12 PM
@PiMpStEr360 lol, it doesnt mean shit that kalou gave away a penalty. it was unintentional it shouldn?t have been a penalty. that was soft. chelsea had several calls missed by the referee, again like every ucl game. and who the fuck cares about one group stage game every1 knows chelseas still gonna win the group. Kalou still created a golden opportunity for Chelsea. Dont blame kalou for not winning, chelsea had a dozen chances and failed to finish.
Comment from PiMpStEr360
Time 2011?10?2? at 9:47 PM
@FrankLampardd08 On the long run, yes. Is it really that hard to understand that ? When Bolton was down by 2 last season, what did they do ? They brought on Klasnic to get another goal. We were desparate. As for Kalou , did last nights game show you nothing ? His attacking abilities were limited, and on top of all that cost the team the win. After last night Kalou wont get another premiership start, just wait and see. AVB knows what hes doing, better than you at least.
Comment from FrankLampardd08
Time 2011?10?2? at 10:21 PM
@PiMpStEr360 Well it worked out great didnt? 0 chances. bombarding the penalty area is just giving the ball away. How is Kalou pure shit. fukin explain it. hes a great player. Look at the past. Drogba and anelka had a good partnership, produced goals. Elmander and davies, Berbatov and Keane, Robinho/Pato/Ibra all scoing an equal 13 goals last season. partnership does mater. Same as 2 center halfs. we saw how terry/luiz worked last season. fukin garbage.
Comment from FrankLampardd08
Time 2011?10?2? at 10:24 PM
@PiMpStEr360 how, how is an 18 year old a better scoring option than malouda. he hasnt proved himself worthy on any level. where does throwing on more strikers get u more goals. since when? please explain. im waiting for u to answer that. 2 strikers means less space for each one. u dont fukin understand IT REQUIRES A PARTNERSHIP. look at davies and elmander. one of them scored in almost every game. And Berbatov and Keane on tottenham in the past. thats the only times u play 2 strikers
Comment from PiMpStEr360
Time 2011?10?2? at 11:23 PM
@FrankLampardd08 in the 09-10 season we also played under a different manager, and had a Drogba that was firing from all angles. We needed to increase our attacking options, and Lukaku was the next best option. Accept it.
Comment from PiMpStEr360
Time 2011?10?2? at 11:58 PM
@FrankLampardd08 Why is it that you think there has to be a partnership. For 30 minutes, partnership or not, if balls are bombared into the united penalty area, its more likely that someone will get on the end of it. Lukaku is more likely to get in the box and score. We both saw now, Malouda is decent on the wings, but Anelka is better any day, and that Kalou is pure shit. The Lukaku substitution might not have influenced the game much, but i support AVB and wouldve done the same.
Comment from FrankLampardd08
Time 2011?10?3? at 12:02 AM
@PiMpStEr360 putting more strikers on the field doesnt make u score more goals. we played the entire 2009/2010 season with 1 striker and we scored 103 goals. idk why ur thinking more strikers means more goals. we created 0 opportunities once lukaku came on, and we had over a dozen be4 he came on. for the 3rd time we were down 3-1 not 3-0. Lukaku ddint even play in the box. playing 2 forwards needs a good partnership, just like 2 center halfs. again, lukaku never played with torres. no partners
Comment from PiMpStEr360
Time 2011?10?3? at 12:34 AM
@FrankLampardd08 Im not looking to blame anyone, i state the obvious. You?re arguing against the gaffers decisions, whos the one looking for someone to blame?. I repeat myself once again? We changed system, Malouda wouldnt play on the LW. And as i said you gamble when ur 3-0 down to united if Drogba was fit he probably wouldve come on for Lukaku you bring in strikers players than will playing the box. There really is no point repeating myself. The match is just about to start, so yeh, growup
Comment from FrankLampardd08
Time 2011?10?3? at 1:08 AM
@PiMpStEr360 So what Kalou was taken off early one time. You?re all lookin for some people to blame for last year and every1 takes it out on kalou drogba lampard and malouda. Where would malouda fit? perhaps on the wing? Anelka switches to the right wing then Malouda on the left. DURR? we were down 3-1 at that point and still makin great chances. Malouda was our top scorer, clearly he doesn?t have an eye for goal. Again, drogba and torres have a big eye for goal, but combined for 0 goals
Comment from PiMpStEr360
Time 2011?10?3? at 2:04 AM
@FrankLampardd08 Firstly, Kalou being taken off on the 30th minute agains WBaAexcludes the Kalou argument all together. Also when you?re three nil down you bring on another striker! Why? Another person with an eye for goal, another person in the box! Where would Malouda even fit !? Sure, Torres may play best as a lone striker, but when you?re 3-0 down vs united, you gamble and try get as many as you can back, hence Lukaku. people like you who think they?re better than the gaffer are real jokes.
Comment from FrankLampardd08
Time 2011?10?3? at 2:25 AM
@PiMpStEr360 WTF DONT U UNDERSTAND. u remember how many goals the drogba and torres partnership produced? ya a big fukin 0. Every1 compares Lukaku?s play style to drogba, and who woulda guessed, how many goals did they score? 0, how many attempts did they have on goal? 0 What a great substitution. You dont need more attacking players when u have torres playing striker alone. you need players to set torres up, therefore malouda, not lukaku. Kalou played well at the start of the season too
Comment from PiMpStEr360
Time 2011?10?3? at 3:09 AM
@FrankLampardd08 A) When was the last time Kalou played well or introduced team work into the team?
B) Yes, Malouda may have been a good option, but i support AVB?s decision to bring in Lukaku as he is more attacking, and i stress he was not played as a winger C) Yes, he is young but players of such potential show their qualities when needed e.g Rooney vs Arsenal when he was 17 years old. D) Mata was employed as a trequartista not a central midfeilder E) Fuck off
Comment from FrankLampardd08
Time 2011?10?3? at 4:07 AM
@PiMpStEr360 Mata was playing middle. Lukaku sux, it was a bad substitution. seriously stop dodging the question. hows it a great sub if torres and lukaku havent played on the same field together. honestly. was he hoping for some individual brilliance from an 18 year old? or some teamwork from malouda, or kalou, 2 premier league veterans
Comment from PiMpStEr360
Time 2011?10?3? at 4:50 AM
@FrankLampardd08 ok. if you say so. really if what you believe makesyou happy then i cant tell you anything to change your mind. I really will not comment again on this video because its ridiculous. Lukaku was put in a striking role, and mata was obviously playing as a?trequartista? but you wouldnt know what that means, so obviously there is no point as i said.
Comment from FrankLampardd08
Time 2011?10?3? at 5:03 AM
@PiMpStEr360 nono plz go on. why cant mata play middle? he was in the middle the entire 2nd half. and please respond to how torres and lukaku have made a great partnership. ur saying AVB put torres and lukaku on together for the first time hoping it would be a good partnership forward? cuz if thats what you?re saying that it truly is a dumb substitution. u really know shit, and u dont wanna keep arguing cuz its going down hill for u
Comment from PiMpStEr360
Time 2011?10?3? at 5:51 AM
@FrankLampardd08 where lukaku recieved the ball has nothing to do with this. the way AVB set the team up at half time is exactly how i described. Im not gonna argue this any longer because ur ability to understand tactics is poor. Its amazing how you can think Mata simply played in Lampards position. I can go on but really theres no point.
Comment from FrankLampardd08
Time 2011?10?3? at 6:48 AM
@PiMpStEr360 this isnt a video game, u dumb nerd. Mata simply played the position lampard was playing, he play right infront of miereles and ramires, with anelka out wide to the left and sturridge to the right. im starting to think u dindt watch the game, cuz lukaku completed 1 run after he came on and lost the ball 4times. all becuz he went out on the wing. Lukaku was a dumb move to put at striker, cuz torres and lukaku never played together. u saw how bad drogba/torres was last year.get my pt?
Comment from PiMpStEr360
Time 2011?10?3? at 7:46 AM
@FrankLampardd08 mate i used caps cos this is getting annoying. We obviously switched to a 4-1-2-1-2, how else would that explain Mata playing in the middle. Whether it was Sturridge or Anelka who played next to Torres it doesnt make a difference. Merieles played as a CDM, and Ramires and Anelka (after the introduction of Lukaku) played on either side of the midfeild. Mata played infront of both of them behind, what became a partnership of Torres and Lukaku upfront.
Comment from FrankLampardd08
Time 2011?10?3? at 8:20 AM
@PiMpStEr360 ok ur in caps lock so it shows how angry ur getting over a conversation on the internet and u expect me to think ur right? when lampard was taken off mata went to the middle, the commentators even noticed it. anelka was on the right and sturridge on the left, stil 4-3-3. why do u think sturridge was nowhere near the box in torres?s goal? cuz he was on the wing. If ur saying we switched to a 4-4-2, then thats a bad move by AVB cuz we never play 4-42, let alone switch to it vs manu
Comment from PiMpStEr360
Time 2011?10?3? at 8:26 AM
@FrankLampardd08 OKAY LOOK. WE STARTED WITH A 4-3-3. OK! Sturridge on the rw with Mata on the lw. AT HALF TIME LAMPARD WAS TAKEN OFF FOR ANELKA. THIS IS WHERE WE SWITCH TO A 4-4-2 MEANING THAT EITHER ANELKA OR STURRIDGE WOULD TAKE A WIDE POSITION. IN THIS CASE IT WAS ANELKA. STURRIDGE WHO SWITCHED POSITION AT HALF TIME FROM A RIGHT WINGER TO A STRIKER WAS TAKEN OFF FOR LUKAKU. RAMIRES OBVIOUSLY ALSO HAD TO TAKE A WIDE POSITION AS MEIRELES AND MATA PLAYED MORE CENTRALLY. FOR FUCKS SAKE UR DUMB.
Source: http://a-h-enews.com/archives/4669
floyd mayweather fsu fsu defiance acc mayweather vs ortiz ncaa football 12
কোন মন্তব্য নেই:
একটি মন্তব্য পোস্ট করুন